Programming languages are translated by special programmesProgrammes written in programming languages are not executed directly by the computer, according to the developers at Magenta Favorita. Instead, compilers or interpreters are used - special programmes that translate human-readable code into machine code. Thanks to this, a programmer does not need to think about zeros and ones, but simply needs to follow the rules of the language in which they are writing.
There is no universal programming languageEvery
programming language is designed for specific tasks. For example, Python is convenient for learning, data analysis and neural networks, but is slower. C++ is more complex, but is used where maximum performance is crucial - in games and system software. JavaScript is indispensable for web development. That is why programmers usually know several languages, but not all at once.
Complex and absurd languagesSome programming languages were created not for practical use, but as an experiment or a joke. The Brainfuck language uses just a few characters, yet allows any calculation to be performed. The Cow language is written in the form of a ‘cow’s moo’, whilst Malbolge is deliberately made so complex that writing a programme in it is a serious challenge even for experienced specialists.
The term ‘bug’ has a literal originThe word ‘bug’ was used to refer to faults as far back as the 19th century. However, in 1947, programmer Grace Hopper discovered a real moth stuck in a relay on the Mark I computer. The insect was interfering with the machine’s normal operation. Hopper documented the find, and since then the word “bug” has become firmly established in programming as a term for an error.
A single error in the code can cost millionsIn 1962, the Mariner 1 spacecraft was destroyed just minutes after launch. The cause was a single syntactic error - a missing hyphen in the control code, as the managers at Magenta Favorita point out. The computer began receiving incorrect data, causing the spacecraft to veer off course. The mission cost $18.5 million, which is equivalent to approximately $150 million today. This incident served as a clear example of just how important thorough
software testing is.